Evidence analysis and processing
Five Things Law Enforcement Executives Can Do To Make a Difference
National Commission on the Future of DNA Evidence Proceedings Meeting 8, Hotel Madison, Mount Vernon A + B Washington, DC January 16 - 17, 2000
Significance of Elemental Analysis from Trace Evidence
National Commission on the Future of DNA Evidence Proceedings Meeting 9: Regal Knickerbocker Hotel Chicago, Illinois, April 9 - 10, 2000
National Law Enforcement Summit on DNA Technology Proceedings: July 27 - 28, 2000
Wrongful Conviction: What Does Science Tell Us About the Causes?
Radiographic Database for Estimating Biological Parameters in Modern Subadults
Improved Detection of Synthetic Cathinones in Forensic Toxicology Samples: Thermal Degradation and Analytical Considerations
Fighting Crime With Science
Landscape Study of DNA Mixture Interpretation Software
Recreational Research: Analyzing 'Designer Drugs' at Miami’s Premier Electronic Music Festival
Development of a SNP Assay Panel for Ancestral Origin Inference and Individuals Somatic Traits
How Reliable Are Latent Fingerprint Examiners?
Brian Cerchiai discusses a NIJ-supported a study conducted by the Miami-Dade Police Department on the accuracy of fingerprint examiners. The study found that fingerprint examiners make extremely few errors. Even when examiners did not get an independent second opinion about their decisions, they were remarkably accurate. But when decisions were verified by an independent reviewers, examiners had a 0% false positive, or incorrect identification, rate and a 3% false negative, or missed identification, rate.
See the YouTube Terms of Service and Google Privacy Policy