Departments of corrections
From Arizona to South Carolina: Transfer of a Prison Design Model
Community Corrections in Oregon: Empowerment Philosophy and Sex Offender Supervision Network
Gang Membership as a Proxy for Social Deficiencies: A Study of Nebraska Inmates
Process Evaluation of Tier IV Connecticut Department of Correction Residential Substance Abuse Treatment Programs, Final Report
Community Meetings as a Tool in Inmate Reentry
Building an Effective Research Partnership Between a University and a State Correctional Agency: Assessment of Drug Treatment in Pennsylvania Prisons
Program-Level Predictors of Antipsychotic Medication Adherence Among Parolees
Getting a Handle on New Technology
Is There a Doctor in the House?
Counting on Biometrics
Dynamics of a Prison-Based Therapeutic Community for Women Offenders: Retention, Completion, and Outcomes
Recidivism Following Mandated Residential Substance Abuse Treatment for Felony Probationers
TECHBeat, November 2018
Recent Changes in Corrections and Reentry: Thoughts From Two Leaders in the Field
Multi-site Randomized Controlled Trial of Comprehensive Trauma Informed Reentry Services for Moderate to High Risk Youth Releasing From State Prisons
The Experiences of Men with Substance Use Disorders Exiting Prison at the Height of the Opioid Crisis
Evaluating Reentry Programs Using Data and Science
Evaluating Reentry Programs Using Data and Science
How do you use data and science to measure program success?
John Wetzel, secretary of corrections, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections and Grant Duwe, Ph.D., director of research and evaluation, Minnesota Department of Corrections explain how their agencies evaluate programs using data and science. Duwe details how the most effective programs provided by the Minnesota DOC have been those that focus on known risk factors for recidivism.
See the YouTube Terms of Service and Google Privacy Policy