Autopsies
Modern Death Investigation: Hub and Spoke Models for Adequate Workforce
Molecular Autopsy Implementation Expert Panel
Understanding the Pathology of Homicidal Pediatric Blunt Neurotrauma through Correlation of Advanced Magnetic Resonance Images with Histopathology
The roles of medical examiners in the COVID-19 era: a comparison between the United States and Italy
Determining the temperature-dependence of tissue relaxation times (T1 and T2) for prospective optimization of post-mortem magnetic resonance (PMMR) image contrast
Quantitation and Validation of 34 Fentanyl Analogs from Liver Tissue Using a QuEChERS Extraction and LC–MS-MS Analysis
Eutylone Intoxications-An Emerging Synthetic Stimulant in Forensic Investigations
Developing the Minimum Dataset for the New Mexico Decedent Image Database
Just Science Podcast: Just Forensic Anthropology and Forensic Pathology Portfolio
Genetic Variants Linked to Sudden Unexplained Deaths
Expanding Research to Examine the Impacts of Forensic Science on the Criminal Justice System
In 2004, the National Institute of Justice created the social science research on forensic sciences (SSRFS) research program to explore the impact of forensic sciences on the criminal justice system and the administration of justice. Much of the early research from the SSRFS program focused on DNA processing and the use of DNA in investigations and prosecutions.
Review the YouTube Terms of Service and the Google Privacy Policy
Overview of Postmortem Computed Tomography for Pathologist Triage
Postmortem Computed Tomography of Blunt Force Trauma
Deaths in Custody: A Comprehensive Review
Fatal Injuries of Law Enforcement/Correctional Officers Attacked With Sharp-Edged Weapons
Forensic Pathology on Both Sides of the Pond, presented by Drs. Michael Baden and Peter Dean
Forensic Science Technology Working Group Operational Requirements
Just Science Podcast: Just the Census of Medical Examiners and Coroners
Using Advanced Imaging Technologies To Enhance Autopsy Practices
Are CEDs Safe and Effective?
Thousands of law enforcement agencies throughout the United States have adopted conducted energy devices (CEDs) as a safe method to subdue individuals, but are these devices really safe? What policies should agencies adopt to ensure the proper use of this technology? This NIJ Conference Panel discusses the physiological effects of electrical current in the human body caused by CEDs, as well as how this technology can reduce injuries to officers and suspects when appropriate policies and training are followed.