This article presents a step-by-step explanation for applied researchers regarding how the algorithm predicts treatment effects based on observables. It then explores how useful the predicted heterogeneity is in practice by testing whether youth with larger predicted treatment effects actually respond more in a hold-out sample. The application highlights some limitations of the causal forest, but it also suggests that the method can identify treatment heterogeneity for some outcomes that more standard interaction approaches would have missed. (Publisher abstract modified)
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Objective and Subjective Experiences of Childhood Maltreatment and Their Relationships with Cognitive Deficits: a Cohort Study in the USA
- Adolescent Mental Health and Resilience Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic
- Research Review: Why do Prospective and Retrospective Measures of Maltreatment Differ? A Narrative Review