NCJ Number
253301
Date Published
2018
Length
31 pages
Annotation
Since there is a research gap in understanding how criminal cases evolve across decision points and how charges change for different racial and ethnic groups at individual decision points and cumulatively, this gap is partially addressed in this study through the examination of charge decreases, increases, and no change at three essential decision pointscase screening for prosecution, arraignment, and final disposition.
Abstract
The results show that, overall, screening and disposition were much more dynamic decision points than was arraignment and that one third of cases experienced a charge decrease at some point. Even though racial differences in charge reductions at case screening were not large, at arraignment and disposition, as well as cumulatively, Black and Latino defendants were less likely than White defendants to have charges decreased. Conversely, Asian defendants experienced even more favorable outcomes than White defendants as they were more likely to have charges reduced and less likely to experience an increase. These findings are framed in the context of focal concerns, cumulative disadvantage, and "charge reasonableness" arguments. (publisher abstract modified)
Date Published: January 1, 2018
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Forensic entomology when the evidence is “no insect.” Best carrion fly species for predicting maximum postmortem interval in the United Arab Emirates
- Clarification of assumptions in the relationship between the bayes decision rule and the whitened cosine similarity measure
- Machine learning for signature verification