Self-report surveys are widely used to measure adolescent risk behavior and academic adjustment, with results having an impact on national policy, assessment of school quality, and evaluation of school interventions; however, data obtained from self-reports can be distorted when adolescents intentionally provide inaccurate or careless responses. The current study applied two approaches for identifying invalid respondents, and contrasts between the valid and invalid responses revealed differences in means, prevalence rates of student adjustment, and associations among reports of bullying victimization and student adjustment outcomes. The results lend additional support for the need to screen for invalid responders in adolescent samples. (publisher abstract modified)
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Genetic mapping of 15 human X chromosomal forensic short tandem repeat (STR) loci through multi-core parallelization
- Persisting Concerns About Image Exposure Among Survivors of Image-Based Sexual Exploitation and Abuse in Childhood
- Recovery and Detection of Ignitable Liquid Residues from the Substrates by Solid Phase Microextraction - Direct Analysis in Real Time Mass Spectrometry