This study examined whether Black, Hispanic, and White high-school students differed in their perceptions of school climate, student engagement, and peer aggression, as measured by the Authoritative School Climate survey, and it tested whether the associations between school climate and both student engagement and peer aggression varied as a function of racial/ethnic group.
This research stemmed from the fact that although research indicates that a positive school climate is associated with higher levels of student engagement and lower rates of peer aggression, less attention has been given to whether such findings are consistent across racial/ethnic groups. The current study found that perceptions of school climate differed between Black and White groups, but not between Hispanic and White groups; however, race/ethnicity did not moderate the associations between school climate and either engagement or peer aggression. Although correlational and cross-sectional in nature, these results are consistent with the conclusion that a positive school climate holds similar benefits of promoting student engagement and reducing victimization experiences across Black, Hispanic, and White groups. The sample consisted of 48,027 students in grades 9-12 (51.4 percent female; 17.9 percent Black, 10.5 percent Hispanic, 56.7 percent White, and 14.9 percent other) attending 323 high schools. Regression models that contrasted racial/ethnic groups controlled for the nesting of students within schools and used student covariates of parent education, student gender, and percentage of schoolmates sharing the same race/ethnicity, as well as school covariates of school size and school percentage of students eligible for free- or reduced-price meals. (Publisher abstract modified)
- Young Men's Attitudes and Neighborhood Risk Factors for Sexual Harassment Perpetration in the United States
- Centering trauma-informed approaches in schools within a social justice framework
- Are progressive chief prosecutors effective in reducing prison use and cumulative racial/ethnic disadvantage? Evidence from Florida