This article presents findings from a descriptive study of 15 diverse prosecutor-led diversion programs.
Pretrial diversion programs began in the 1970s with the intention to provide participants an alternative to incarceration and prevent the negative impact of conviction, while allowing criminal justice providers reduced caseloads. Early programs emphasized goals of employment and rehabilitation. While initial evaluation results were encouraging, findings from more sophisticated research studies were negative and helped to discredit diversion programs. More recently, prosecutors have begun reintroducing diversion programs with more pragmatic goals such as reduced case processing costs and expungement of criminal records to prevent loss of access to the employment market. The article describes the goals of these programs, program eligibility, program requirements, and dispositions upon successful completion; and it draws contrasts between modern programs and their predecessors. (publisher abstract modified)
Downloads
Related Datasets
Similar Publications
- Expanding on the factor structure and construct validity of the Short-Term Assessment of Risk and Treatability (START) in a general correctional sample
- Principles of Fluorogenic Reagent Design for Forensics. Recent Progress Towards New Reagents to Develop Fingerprints in Blood and on Variable Surfaces
- Identifying Facilitators and Barriers to Implementing the Say Something Anonymous Reporting System in Miami-Dade County, USA: A Qualitative Study