In this article, Professor Heumann and Lance Cassak present data which suggest that juries may be unwilling to convict, regardless of the prosecutor's having proved his case beyond a reasonable doubt, if they know such a sentence will inevitably be imposed. Although mandatory sentence statutes are often well-publicized to maximize their deterrent effect, defendants whose juries happen to be ignorant of the mandatory sentence may consequently be adversely affected. This disparate impact caused by disparate levels of juror knowledge leads the authors to offer due process and equal protection arguments that jurors be notified at some stage of the proceeding that a mandatory penalty will be imposed if the defendant is convicted. (Publisher abstract)
Downloads
No download available
Related Datasets
Similar Publications
- “They are not victimless crimes…that's frustrating to hear”: Qualitative insights from prosecutors working on cases related to technology facilitated child sexual abuse material
- Does variation across judicial circuits matter? Examining the role of bail schedules and pretrial detention on drug case outcomes in Florida
- Using Civil Remedies for Criminal Behavior: Rationale, Case Studies, and Constitutional Issues