Analyses were conducted on a derivation sample of 3,894 adolescents from 37 schools (Study 1) and an independent cross-validation sample of 938 middle school youth (Study 2). Categorical confirmatory factor analyses supported a two-factor model (perpetration and victimization) over models differentiating psychological and physical forms of aggression. The model was invariant across time, sex, grade, and season. Study 2 also supported dating aggression as distinct from general aggression. Results supported measuring dating aggression perpetration and victimization as latent constructs represented by ordered categorical indicators that capture item severity and frequency. (Publisher abstract)
Downloads
Similar Publications
- “Nothing I said would have mattered”: Categorizing barriers to intervening in workplace mistreatment
- Confirmation Bias and Other Systemic Causes of Wrongful Convictions: A Sentinel Events Perspective
- Cognitive and contextual influences in determination of latent fingerprint suitability for identification judgments