One explanation for this phenomenon is that, within similar charges, juvenile offenses are less serious than adult offenses. To explore this idea, 32 prosecutors and 6 law clerks in Union County, N.J., rated the seriousness of the behaviors of 474 juvenile and 468 adult male assault and robbery defendants. Juveniles charged with either crime used weapons only infrequently; when weapons were employed, they were more likely to be objects. In contrast, adults usually employed weapons, and these were firearms in the overwhelming majority of offenses. While juveniles were more likely to cause injury, injuries rarely were life-threatening. Adults were less likely to inflict injuries, but were responsible for the vast majority of shootings, stabbings, and deaths. For both offenses, raters' perceived juvenile offenses to be less serious than adult offenses. Results indicate that there is a wide disparity between the seriousness of assaults and robberies committed by juveniles and adults and question the validity of one rationale for recent juvenile sentencing reforms. 2 tables and 25 references. (Author abstract modified)
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Supporting Implementation of Universal Prevention Initiatives in K-12 Schools: Impacts on Fidelity through Organizational Readiness and Team Functioning in a Cluster-Randomized Trial
- Process Evaluation of the Virginia Department of Juvenile Justice’s Regional Service Coordination Model: NIJ Final Report
- Evaluating a Cognitive Behavioral Approach for Improving Life Outcomes of Underserved Young Women: A Randomized Experiment in Chicago