NCJ Number
249827
Journal
NIJ Journal Issue: 277 Dated: 2016
Date Published
June 2016
Length
5 pages
Publication Series
Annotation
This article reports the methodology and findings of a study that systematically collected prevalence estimates for campus sexual assault in the United States that were published between January 2000 and February 2015, with "prevalence" defined as the "percentage of study participants who reported sexual victimization since entering college or during a study follow-up period or time frame while attending college."
Abstract
The overall conclusion of the study is that although prevalence rates for campus sexual assault on college campuses varied among the studies reviewed, they all report that a substantial number of college students were sexually assaulted for the 15-year period covered. This review of the studies found that estimates of completed forcible rape, incapacitated rape, unwanted sexual contact, and sexual coercion on college campuses in the United States varied widely. Unwanted sexual contact and sexual coercion were apparently the most prevalent, followed by incapacitated rape and attempted or completed forcible rape. This article shows which factors are associated with higher or lower prevalence rates. The variability in prevalence rates among estimates is due largely to differences in measurement and definitions of sexual assault among studies. To date, the majority of research on campus sexual assault has been limited to White, heterosexual, female students attending 4-year colleges. Few studies have measured prevalence among racial and ethnic minority students or other students who may be at particular risk for campus sexual assault, such as lesbian and bisexual women, sorority women, students with disabilities, and students who have suffered prior victimization. The authors of this article recommend that schools address this issue by increasing their understanding of the types of sexual victimization occurring on their campuses and then tailor prevention and intervention strategies, as well as victim treatment services, based on their findings.
Date Published: June 1, 2016
Similar Publications
- An Evaluation of Crime Victim Compensation in New York: Part of a National Study of Victim Compensation Programs
- Coordinated Strangulation Incident Response Training for Law Enforcement Officers and Emergency Medical Personnel
- Assessment of Sexual Assault Kit (SAK) Evidence Selection Leading to Development of SAK Evidence Machine-Learning Model (SAK-ML Model)