The authors present their research methodology and results from a comparison of humans versus algorithm-based recognition performance, of high-resolution still frontal face images, three-dimensional face images, and single-iris images.
This paper describes the large-scale experimental results from the Face Recognition Vendor Test (FRVT) 2006 and the Iris Challenge Evaluation (ICE) 2006. The FRVT 2006 looked at recognition from high-resolution still frontal face images and 3D face images, and measured performance for still frontal face images taken under controlled and uncontrolled illumination. The ICE 2006 evaluation reported verification performance for both left and right irises. The images in the ICE 2006 intentionally represent a broader range of quality than the ICE 2006 sensor would normally acquire. This includes images that did not pass the quality control software embedded in the sensor. The FRVT 2006 results from controlled still and 3D images document at least an order-of-magnitude improvement in recognition performance over the FRVT 2002. The FRVT 2006 and the ICE 2006 compared recognition performance from high-resolution still frontal face images, 3D face images, and the single-iris images. On the FRVT 2006 and the ICE 2006 data sets, recognition performance was comparable for high-resolution frontal face, 3D face, and the iris images. In an experiment comparing humans and algorithms on matching face identity across changes in illumination on frontal face images, the best performing algorithms were more accurate than humans on unfamiliar faces. (Published Abstract Provided)
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Development of baseline survey of random presence of glass and paint for the interpretation of evidence in the US courts
- The Role of Simulated Data in Making the Best Predictions (from the 87th Annual Meeting of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists - 2018)
- Human Decomposition Ecology at the University of Tennessee Anthropology Research Facility