Examining the Link Between Parole Officers' Bases of Power and Their Exercise of Power

• NCJ Number: 240368
• Journal: Prison Journal Volume: 92 Issue: 4 Dated: December 2012 Pages: 435-459
• Author(s): Benjamin Steiner; Rhys Hester; Matthew D. Makarios; Lawrence F. Travis III
• Date Published: December 2012
• Length: 25 pages
• Grant Number(s): 2005-IJ-CX-0038
• Agencies: NIJ-Sponsored
• Publication Type: Report (Study/Research)
• Award: EXAMINING THE IMPACT OF OHIO'S PROGRESSIVE SANCTION GRID

Annotation

This study is an examination of parole officers' perceptions of their bases of power and whether those perceptions influenced officers' use of their power to revoke offenders' parole.

Abstract

Parole officers are responsible for supervising offenders conditionally released from prisons into communities. This structural arrangement creates a power relationship, with officers' views providing the foundation for various bases of power and possibly influencing their exercise of discretionary power. This study is an examination of parole officers' perceptions of their bases of power and whether those perceptions influenced officers' use of their power to revoke offenders' parole. Findings revealed that officers identified legitimate and reward power as the primary means by which they gain compliance; however, only legitimate power and expert power were linked to officers' use of power. Abstract published by arrangement with Sage Journals.