This article reports some of the major findings of a national evaluation funded by the National Institute of Justice. The evaluation adopted a variety of strategies and methodologies, including national surveys of media executives and Crime Stoppers program coordinators, case studies to understand program processes and effects, and a randomized experiment to examine the effects of varying reward sizes on callers' perceptions, attitudes, and behaviors. Crime Stoppers is a very popular program that features the mass media in a pivotal and uniquely cooperative role with law enforcement and the community. Despite some impressive program statistics on felony arrests, convictions, and recovery of property and drugs, the impact of these interventions on community crime levels remains unknown. Furthermore, Crime Stoppers has been criticized by journalists, civil libertarians, and members of the legal profession for offering cash rewards and anonymity to encourage more citizen participation in the criminal justice system. 19 references, 6 tables. (Author abstract)
Downloads
Similar Publications
- How Important is Developmental Maturity in Assessing Whether Adolescents Will Share True or False Accounts of a First Offense in Legal Interactions?
- The School Responder Model (SRM): Virtual Toolbox
- Criminalistics--Scientia Sui Generis--Arguments Pro et Contra (From Policing in Central and Eastern Europe: Dilemmas of Contemporary Criminal Justice, P 372-379, 2004, Gorazd Mesko, et al., eds. -- See NCJ-207973)