In assessing these hypotheses, the authors analyzed trends in criminal justice policy reform from 2000 to 2013 and newspaper stories and editorials on criminal justice reform since 2008. Although this analysis found important examples of changing rhetoric and policy, it concludes that these changes do not constitute a "paradigm shift." Rather, they are indicative of a more subtle, complex, and contradictory modification of the way punishment is conceived, discussed, and ultimately enacted. 68 references (Publisher abstract modified)
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Community Supervision Officers' Perceptions of Risk and Desistance Among Clients on Probation or Parole A Case Study in Georgia
- Structuring Justice: How Prosecutorial Offices Handle Hate Crime Detection and Prosecution
- Testing Gender-Differentiated Models of the Mechanisms Linking Polyvictimization and Youth Offending: Numbing and callousness versus dissociation and borderline traits