In a discussion, panelists note that incarceration rates have dropped markedly since the program's inception in 1984. Public support of the program has been good because offenders pay restitution, pay the State to offset the cost of supervision, and work to support dependents and families. Also discussed are concerns that such programs require probation officers to act more like police officers, the potential for de-emphasizing rehabilitation, and the possibility that house arrest may result in net-broadening.
Watch
Similar Publications
- “Nothing I said would have mattered”: Categorizing barriers to intervening in workplace mistreatment
- Raman spectroscopic signature of vaginal fluid and its potential application in forensic body fluid identification
- Evaluating a Multi-Disciplinary Response to Domestic Violence: The DVERT Program in Colorado Springs