This study investigated body armor configurations (3 levels) on usability perceptions following simulated tasks.
Body armor is a critical part of the law enforcement uniform. It provides protection from ballistic impacts during critical events. Despite many agencies providing armor to its employees, compliance with use standards within agencies has been reported to be low due to discomfort. Few studies exist in the public domain that have documented specific design features that contribute to the non-compliance issues. Results indicated that differences in design ratings, overall ratings, and rating of interference differed for each configuration studied. Specifically arm, shoulder, and neck movement was identified as being restrictive. Further, it impacted the ability of the officers to gain control of reach essential equipment (e.g., handcuffs) and in the completion of essential tasks (e.g., suspect restraint). Therefore, design considerations affect user perceptions of the armor and may be responsible for non-compliance issues.
Downloads
Similar Publications
- We Need to Not Fear You: Essential Factors Identified by Sworn Officers and Civilian Staff for Implementation and Expansion of a Co-Response Program
- The Impact of a Brief and Immersive Use-of-force Training Exercise on Citizens' Attitudes Toward Police
- An Evaluation of Operation Hardcore: Prosecutorial Response to Violent Gang Criminality