NCJ Number
255154
Journal
Science & Justice Volume: 56 Issue: 5 Dated: September 2016 Pages: 380-382
Date Published
September 2016
Length
3 pages
Annotation
As one of the articles in the Virtual Special Issue of Science & Justice entitled, "Measuring and Reporting the Precision of Forensic Likelihood Ratios," the current article argues that given the current state of knowledge, reporting uncertainty in the likelihood ratio is best practice.
Abstract
The author notes, however, that in the future, this practice may be replaced by reporting a Bayes factor, but this is not currently possible except in the simplest of examples. (publisher abstract modified)
Date Published: September 1, 2016
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Cross-validation and evaluation of the performance of methods for the elemental analysis of forensic glass by μ-XRF, ICP-MS, and LA-ICP-MS
- Testing Gender-Differentiated Models of the Mechanisms Linking Polyvictimization and Youth Offending: Numbing and callousness versus dissociation and borderline traits
- Functional Morphology and Medical Imaging