Research design
State-Mandated Criminal Background Employment Screening: A High Stakes Window into the Desistance Process
Screening for Poly-Victimization in Predicting a Range of Behavioral and Justice-Related Outcomes in Justice-Referred Youths Screened at Intake
Impact of Incarceration on Families: A Single-Jurisdiction Pilot Study Using Triangulated Administrative Data & Qualitative Interviews
Desistance From Crime Over the Life Course
Countermeasure Mechanisms and Ecological Validity of P300-Based Concealed Information Tests
A New Role for Technology: The Impact of Video Visitation on Corrections Staff, Prisoners, and their Families
Assessing the Effectiveness of Four Juvenile Justice Interventions on Adult Criminal Justice and Child Welfare Outcomes
Advanced Research in Microspectrophotometry of Fibers: Analysis and Interpretation
The Role of Indigent Defense for Defendants with Mental Health Disorders
Use of Novel Chemistry & Microwave Instrumentation to ImproveBody Fluid Assay Sensitivity & Speed while Reducing Costs
Game Change: How Researcher-Practitioner Partnerships Are Redefining How We Study Crime
Opening Plenary Panel
When researchers and practitioners work side by side, they can maximize their problem-solving abilities. The research partner can focus on the data and the science; the practitioner can focus on interpreting the findings and applying them in the field. In the plenary panel, panelists described the benefits, challenges and pitfalls of researcher-practitioner partnerships with a focus on the financial benefits to the practitioner.
Moderator: John H. Laub, Director, National Institute of Justice
Panelists:
Review the YouTube Terms of Service and the Google Privacy Policy