Criminal justice systems
Forensic DNA Backlog Reduction Program-Honolulu Police Department
FY 2012 Forensic DNA Backlog Reduction Program-Kansas City Police Department
FY2012 DNA Backlog Reduction Program - Union County
FY 2012 DNA Backlog Reduction Program - Hennepin County
FY 2012 DNA Backlog Reduction Program - Sacramento County California
FY 2012 Forensic DNA Backlog Reduction Program - City of Mansfield
FY 12 DNA Backlog Reduction Program - Massachusetts State Police Forensic Services Group
FY2012 Forensic DNA Backlog Reduction Program - City of Colorado Springs.
FY 2012 Forensic DNA Backlog Reduction Program: Ohio Attorney General - Bureau of Criminal Identification and Investigation
FY 2012 DNA Backlog Reduction Program - St. Lucie County Sheriff Office (Indian River Crime Laboratory)
FY 12 DNA Backlog Reduction Program - County of Alameda, California
FY2012 DNA Backlog Reduction Program for the Canton-Stark County Crime Laboratory
FY12 DNA Backlog Reduction Program - Montgomery County Police Crime Lab
FY2012 Forensic DNA Backlog Reduction Program - Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation (OSBI)
FY12 DNA Backlog Reduction Program- City of Oaland Police Department
FY 2012 DNA Backlog Reduction-Santa Clara County District Attorney's Crime Laboratory
FY 2012 DNA Backlog Reduction Program-City of Tulsa
Forensic DNA Backlog Reduction and Capacity Enhancement Program for the Orange County Crime Laboratory
Using Random Forest Risk Prediction in the Philadelphia Probation Department
Watch two experts talk about developing a computerized system that successfully predicts — with a high degree of accuracy — which probationers are likely to violently reoffend within two years of returning to the community.
Drs. Barnes and Hyatt teamed up with the Philadelphia Adult Probation & Parole Department in an NIJ-funded project. Here they discuss:
See the YouTube Terms of Service and Google Privacy Policy
FY 12 Office of Investigative and Forensic Sciences Continuations - County of Alameda, California
Game Change: How Researcher-Practitioner Partnerships Are Redefining How We Study Crime
Opening Plenary Panel
When researchers and practitioners work side by side, they can maximize their problem-solving abilities. The research partner can focus on the data and the science; the practitioner can focus on interpreting the findings and applying them in the field. In the plenary panel, panelists described the benefits, challenges and pitfalls of researcher-practitioner partnerships with a focus on the financial benefits to the practitioner.
Moderator: John H. Laub, Director, National Institute of Justice
Panelists:
See the YouTube Terms of Service and Google Privacy Policy