NCJ Number
249335
Date Published
March 2015
Length
7 pages
Annotation
This study investigated a number of diagnostics in assessing the performance of a model (Hd true tests) for testing likelihood ratios produced from complex DNA profiles.
Abstract
The performance of any model used to analyze DNA profile evidence should be tested using simulation, large-scale validation studies based on ground-truth cases, or alignment with trends predicted by theory. The focus of the current work was the proportion of comparisons to non-contributors that yield a likelihood ratio (LR) higher than or equal to the likelihood ratio of a known contributor (LRPOI), designated as p, and the average LR for Hd true tests. Theory predicts that p should always be less than or equal to 1/LRPOI and hence the observation of this in any particular case is of limited use. A better diagnostic is the average LR for Hd true which should be near to 1. The current study tested the performance of a continuous interpretation model on nine DNA profiles of varying quality and complexity and verified the theoretical expectations. (Publisher abstract modified)
Date Published: March 1, 2015
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Linking Ammonium Nitrate – Aluminum (AN-AL) Post-Blast Residues to PreBlast Explosive Materials Using Isotope Ratio and Trace Elemental Analysis for Source Attribution
- Computational Methods for the Interpretation of Forensic DNA Samples
- Characterizing the Natural Genetic and Epigenetic Diversity of Human Populations