U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites always use a .gov or .mil domain. Before sharing sensitive information online, make sure you’re on a .gov or .mil site by inspecting your browser’s address (or “location”) bar.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Study of Deaths Following Electro Muscular Disruption: Interim Report

NCJ Number
222981
Date Published
Author(s)
National Institute of Justice
Annotation
This report conducted by the U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice, presents results from a medical panel addressing whether conducted energy devices (CEDs), devices utilized by more than 11,000 law enforcement agencies across the country as the less-lethal weapon of choice, can contribute to or cause mortality and if so, in what ways.
Abstract
Although exposure to conducted energy device (CED) is not risk free, there is no conclusive medical evidence within the state of current research that indicates a high risk of serious injury or death from the direct effects of CED exposure. Field experience with CED use indicates that exposure is safe in the vast majority of cases. Therefore, law enforcement need not refrain from deploying CEDs, provided the devices are used in accordance with accepted national guidelines. During the 3 years from 2003 through 2005, 47 states and the District of Columbia reported 1,095 arrest-related deaths proximal to law enforcement’s use of force. To limit injuries and deaths, less-lethal technologies have been used since the early 1990s. It is reported that some 11,500 law enforcement agencies have acquired conducted energy devices (CEDs), of which the leading manufacturer of CEDs, TASER International, introduced in 2003. However, a significant number of individuals have died after exposure to a CED giving rise to questions regarding the safety of CEDs. This report presents a consensus view of a panel consisting of physicians, medical examiners, and other relevant specialists in cardiology, emergency medicine, epidemiology, pathology, and toxicology from a complete review of the available, peer-reviewed research literature and extensive information concerning the use of CEDs in the field. The findings have been limited to those conclusions that can be reached based on current understanding. New research and case studies will continue to be examined by the panel of deaths proximate to the use of CEDs. Glossary and references
Date Created: June 22, 2008