Growing empirical research finds that a correctional system devoted to punishment is ineffective and can produce criminogenic effects. As a result, justice organizations, including probation, are encouraging managers and staff to adopt evidence-based practices (EBPs), supported by scientific evidence, such as validated risk and needs assessments and cognitive-behavioral therapies. Implementation of EBPs falls heavily on street-level workers, such as probation officers (POs) as they implement policy; yet, little attention has been given to whether and how EBPs align within the traditionally authoritarian justice environment. The findings of the current study indicate that probation staff continue to make discretionary decisions regarding with whom they can use EBPs and in which situations EBP use is appropriate. Findings have significant implications for the acceptability, feasibility, and transportability of EBPs in criminal justice environments. (publisher abstract modified)
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Longitudinal Cohort Study: Predictive Validity of the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth Individual/Clinical Risk Factor on Recidivism Among Mississippi Justice-Involved Youth
- Evaluating a Young Adult Court (YAC) to Address Inequalities for Transitional Age Youth in Orange County
- Identifying and Embedding Brokers into a Multi-tiered System of Services to Reduce the Bystander Effect Leading to a Reduction in School Violence: End of Grant Report