NCJ Number
117829
Date Published
January 1979
Length
11 pages
Annotation
This analysis empirically examines a major problem with most previous comparative studies: the failure to disaggregate the overall homicide rate into more refined and conceptually meaningful categories of homicide.
Abstract
A theoretically integrated model used homicide rates disaggregated by the victim/offender relationship and the precipitating incident for a sample of American cities in 1980-84. The findings revealed significant evidence of differential effects. All of the indicators except regional location had significant effects on the total homicide rate, but estimation using the disaggregated rates showed that some of the indicators had rather extensive effects (e.g., percent poor and divorce rate), and the effects of others (e.g., justifiable-homicide ratio and population density) were more limited. Although the effects of the indicators varied, that variation was not random. Rather, the patterns observed were theoretically expected. The conclusion from the findings should not be that the total homicide rate is meaningless and should be discontinued. It is useful for determining general homicide patterns; however, finding a significant effect for the total homicide rate does not necessarily mean that the variable is causally relevant for all forms of homicide. Disaggregated rates must be analyzed to determine this. 3 tables, 35 references.
Date Published: January 1, 1979
Downloads
No download available
Similar Publications
- A Comparison of Laser Ablation Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) Micro X-Ray Fluorescence (uXRF) and Laser Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS) for the Discrimination of Automotive Glass
- Microspectrophotometric Analysis of Yellow Polyester Fiber Dye Loadings With Chemometric Techniques
- The Sexual Stratification Hypothesis: Is the Decision to Arrest Influenced by the Victim/Suspect Racial/Ethnic Dyad?