Selective incapacitation involves the incarceration of offenders predicted to be at high risk of future offending. Proponents of this proposal argue that it will both reduce crime and the number of persons in prison. Opponents claim that prediction accuracy is not sufficient to incorporate it in sentencing, since false positives will lead to the incarceration of low-risk offenders and false negatives will put high-risk offenders back in the community. The proposal is also challenged because it bases sentencing on possible future behavior rather than on conviction for the charged offense. Risk prediction could be used for the early release of inmates when prison capacities have been exceeded. Persons would continue to be sentenced under traditional sentencing criteria, but they would be given early release based on the prediction of future criminality. Ethical concerns about false positives under such a scheme would be mitigated, since those judged to be at high risk of recidivism would complete their initial sentences. 44 footnotes.
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Expanding on the factor structure and construct validity of the Short-Term Assessment of Risk and Treatability (START) in a general correctional sample
- Testing Systems-Level Theories and Impacts of Supermax Prisons: A Macrolevel Longitudinal Analysis
- An Evaluation of Operation Hardcore: Prosecutorial Response to Violent Gang Criminality