In this article, the authors use juvenile court processing data to examine the predictive validity of the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth, noting that findings support the continued use of SAVRY as an evidence-based tool for identifying youth risk level and treatment needs.
Recidivism, and its contributing factors, remains a primary concern among juvenile justice practitioners. The literature has identified numerous policies and practices that reduce reoffending. Among these is use of validated assessment tools to identify risk level and treatment needs of youth. Using six years of juvenile court processing data, the authors examine the predictive validity of the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY), a structured professional judgement tool used to predict risk of violence and recidivism among youth aged 12 to 18. Findings support the use of the SAVRY to predict general recidivism, especially among males and highlights the importance of conducting gender-specific analyses. Analyses did not identify patterned race/ethnicity differences in risk. The authors’ findings recommend the continued use of the SAVRY as an evidence-based instrument. (Published Abstract Provided)
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Factor Structure of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale among Early Adolescents: Results from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study
- Adolescent Weapon Carrying Inside and Outside of School: The Impact of Experiences and Perceptions of Violence
- Staff As a Conduit for Contraband: Developing and Testing Key Assumptions of Professional Boundary Violations in Prison