Using a survey of LEAs and interviews with knowledgeable LEA personnel across the United States, the study found that for most technologies, a greater proportion of large agencies (250 or more sworn officers) had adopted the technology than those from the entire LEA sample; however, a notable exception is the finding that large agencies were less likely to have used some technological devices, such as body-worn cameras, in the past 2 years. Site-level data showed the difference in how ingrained different technology is from agency to agency; i.e., two agencies may have implemented the same technology, but the level of sophistication and use can differ widely. Overall, the findings suggest that the success or failure of technology can be multidimensional and can rarely be traced to a single issue. Thus, technology identification and adoption are complex processes, with factors that support technology success or failure being similarly multifaceted. Generally, there was not a strong association between policing strategy and technology uses. Thus, at a national level, LEAs are not making decisions to acquire technology based on dominant policing philosophies or the activities they prioritize. A number of factors influence the prevalence and types of technology used by LEAs, including executive staff decisions based on perceived needs, community demands, and available funding. 20 exhibits, 82 references, and appended Law Enforcement Technology Survey and interview guides
Downloads
Related Datasets
Similar Publications
- Tablets behind bars: evidence from a staggered adoption difference-in-differences study of prison misconduct
- Criminal Justice Interventions for Offenders With Mental Illness: Evaluation of Mental Health Courts in Bronx and Brooklyn, New York, Executive Summary
- Model for Wide-Area Patrol Policy Evaluation