This study examined the relationship between DNA evidence and outcomes of prosecution of sexual assault.
Researchers coded data from prosecutor and crime laboratory files for sexual assault cases referred to prosecutors between 2005 and 2011 in a metropolitan jurisdiction in the northeastern United States. Cases with a DNA match were significantly more likely to move forward and result in conviction, even with other predictor variables statistically controlled. Analyses suggest DNA evidence contributes to case progression but also is a result of it. These findings strengthen the case for quality forensic medical examinations, investment in DNA analysis, and increased prosecutor training. (Publisher Abstract)
Downloads
Similar Publications
- New Psychoactive Substances in Wastewater from Rest Areas and Commercial Weigh Stations along Interstate Highways
- Assessing the expanded capacity of modern μ-XRF SDD systems for forensic analysis through an interlaboratory study: Part II—Vehicle glass
- Proteomic Genotyping for Individual Human Identification: Inferring SNPs in the Absence of DNA Evidence