Using qualitative data from 47 complaints of intimate partner sexual assault (IPSA) that were referred to Los Angeles County or City prosecution in 2008, this study examined the factors that influenced charging decisions.
Prosecutors play a crucial role in determining whether persons who are accused of IPSA will be sanctioned by the criminal justice system. Prosecutors have unconditional discretion at the initial charging stage because a case rejection decision is typically immune to review. Findings of the current study suggest that prosecutors consider both legal and extralegal factors when making charging decisions and that various cultural, legal, and rape myths surrounding IPSA influence these decisions. (Publisher abstract modified)
Downloads
Similar Publications
- “Nothing I said would have mattered”: Categorizing barriers to intervening in workplace mistreatment
- The Cross-Reactivity of the Cannabinoid Analogs (delta-8-THC, delta-10-THC and CBD) and their metabolites in Urine of Six Commercially Available Homogeneous Immunoassays, Grant Report
- Telephone Conferencing in Civil and Criminal Court Cases