NCJ Number
255260
Date Published
2017
Length
9 pages
Annotation
Since research on law enforcement agencies' policies and practices regarding body armor is scarce, this study examined whether there are different agency-level profiles of various body armor-related policies, and related these body armor policy profiles to agency characteristics, size, location, etc.
Abstract
The study determined that U.S. law enforcement agencies have four distinct profiles based on their body armor policies. Almost half of the agencies had comprehensive coverage of body armor policies in all aspects; however, nearly one in five had weak body armor policies in all aspects. The rest of the agencies split into two groups, each with different strengths and weaknesses on selection, training, fitting, wearing, and inspection policies. Sheriff's offices and smaller agencies had weaker policies. In contrast, agencies with a community policing emphasis and those with body armor grants had stronger body armor polices, especially regarding mandatory wearing polices. Findings from the study provide a portrait of the current state of law enforcement agency body armor policies, as well as guidance for improving body armor policies and practices. (publisher abstract modified)
Date Published: January 1, 2017
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Testing the Invariance of Warrior and Guardian Orientations on the Prioritization of Procedural Justice: Do Officer Demographics Matter?
- Exposure to Child Sexual Abuse Material among Law Enforcement Investigators: Exploring Trauma and Resilience Profiles
- “We Need to Not Fear You”: Essential Factors Identified by Sworn Officers and Civilian Staff for Implementation and Expansion of a Co-Response Program