The analysis focuses on how the two legal systems are rationalized, in terms of how the legal system is deliberately tailored to achieve agreed upon values and how it is operated according to established principles. The comparison shows that the Italian system is based on formal rationality in which legal decisionmaking systems are operated according to strictly legal principles. Substantive rationality refers to systems guided by other principles; in the American case, these principles include expediency and political control. Cultural influences in Italy, including a societal fear of concentrated power and the pursuit of formal rationality, have impeded their willingness to import strategies for discretionary prosecution as accepted in the United States. 16 notes and 27 references (Author abstract modified)
Downloads
Similar Publications
- "Roses have Thorns for a Reason”: The Promises and Perils of Critical Youth Participatory Research with System-impacted Girls of Color
- Cohort bias in predictive risk assessments of future criminal justice system involvement
- Expert versus Youth Raters on Measuring Social and Therapeutic Climate in Secure Juvenile Placement