Reports from Phase I testing indicate that the technology showed significant promise when working with certain types of standardized samples. The processing is simple and quick, and there are no chemicals to mix and no precautionary measures that are required when dealing with acids. A fume hood or protective equipment are not needed, and no mirror-like polish has to be put on the sample first. Some drawbacks were found, however, in using magneto-optical technology to recover obliterated firearms serial numbers. Although the technology worked well on ferrous metals, this was not the case with non-ferrous metals or zinc alloys. Also, the sensor must contact a planar surface directly, which is difficult for the many firearm serial numbers located on curved parts of a firearm or are otherwise obstructed. In addition, the technology's cost is prohibitive ($15,000 compared to a few hundred dollars for other methods). Despite these drawbacks to the technology, the research will continue to Phase II in an effort to adapt the promising portion of the technology to real-world use. Results from Phase II testing, which is currently being conducted, should be available in late 2014 or early 2015.
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Frontal sinus morphology as a forensic identification method: a comparison of intra-observer scores between scout radiographs and 3D skull images
- Forensic Comparison and Matching of Fingerprints: Using Quantitative Image Measures for Estimating Error Rates Through Understanding and Predicting Difficulty
- Inferring bone attribution to species through micro-Computed Tomography: A comparison of third metapodials from Homo sapiens and Ursus americanus