This paper examines the responses of judges, prosecutors, and defense attorneys in six major urban jurisdictions to a set of hypothetical cases in which evidence of the victim's past sexual conduct is at issue. The different kinds of sexual history evidence evoke different responses from officials, and the specific provisions of the six rape shield statutes also affect officials' judgments. 4 notes, 1 figure, 3 tables, 1 appendix, and 37 references (Publisher's abstract)
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Mental Health and Rape History in Relation to Non-Medical Use of Prescription Drugs in a National Sample of Women
- Understanding the Health Consequences of Sexual Victimization: Assessing the Impact of Social and Economic Factors
- Utilizing eDNA from Bacteria, Fungi, Plants, and Arthropods Associated with Mock Geologic Evidence for Sample-to-Sample Comparisons and Study Site Separation: A Feasibility Study