U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

The Impacts of Paper Properties on Matrix Effects During Paper Spray Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Prescription Drugs, Fentanyl and Synthetic Cannabinoids

NCJ Number
Brandon J. Bills; Jeffrey Kinkade; Greta Ren; Nicholas E. Manicke
Date Published
December 2018
8 pages
This study assessed the effect of pore size, flow rate, and thickness on ionization efficiency, and recovery was assessed in the use of paper spray mass spectrometry for detecting designer drugs.
Designer drugs, drugs synthesized in a lab that mimic other drugs of abuse, have become a major cause of death in the United States. Limitations in either speed, sensitivity, or selectivity of current analytical techniques hinder rapid detection of designer drugs. Paper spray mass spectrometry (PS-MS) is a rapid ambient pressure technique capable of detecting analytes in complex matrices; however, due to a lack of sample cleanup and chromatography, matrix effects can have a significant impact on the detection limits. Previous work has shown that the paper spray substrate has an impact on matrix effects, but the current literature lacks a systematic approach to studying different properties of paper with regards to matrix effects. In the current study, cellulose thin layer chromatography (TLC) plates were made along with a universal spray cartridge to provide a porous spray substrate similar to paper but with easily controllable properties. It was found that substrates with the highest filtration properties (thicker, slower flow rate, or smaller pore sizes) exhibited lower analyte recovery, but improved ionization efficiency. This trend was verified with an offline extraction conducted with a 3D printed centrifuge extractor. Paper/solvent combinations were tested with urine samples to determine whether selecting a paper and solvent with better ionization efficiency could improve detection limits. Although for some drugs minimizing ionization suppression improved detection limits, other drug targets, like those that were charged at physiological pH, were largely unaffected. For analytes that showed improvement, both the paper and the solvent had an impact, although most of the improvement was due to the solvent. (publisher abstract modified)

Date Published: December 1, 2018