THIS ARTICLE EXAMINES THE RESPONSES OF LARGE POLICE DEPARTMENTS, STATE COURT ADMINISTRATIONS AND STATE DEPARTMENTS OF CORRECTION TO A QUESTIONNAIRE ABOUT THE USEFULNESS OF RESEARCH, THE AREAS OF UTILITY, THE SOURCES OF THE RESEARCH, THE DESIGNS EMPLOYED, AND THE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE PERSONS PRODUCING THE RESEARCH, THE RESPONSES DISCLOSED THAT CRIMINAL JUSTICE AGENCIES VIEWED RESEARCH AS BEING MODERATELY OR CONSIDERABLY USEFUL IN IMPROVING THEIR OPERATIONS. IN-HOUSE RESEARCH WAS GENERALLY THE MOST HIGHLY VALUED SOURCE....MSP
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Implementing Frequent Substance Use Testing with Swift-Certain-Fair Sanctions: Stakeholder Insights from a Pilot Program with Volunteer Probationers
- Forensic Identification of an Individual in Complex DNA Mixtures Utilizing SNP Technology
- Multi-Door Courthouse Project (Multi-Door Dispute Resolution Centers) of the American Bar Association Special Committe on Dispute Resolution, Phase I - Intake and Referral Assessment