THIS ARTICLE EXAMINES THE RESPONSES OF LARGE POLICE DEPARTMENTS, STATE COURT ADMINISTRATIONS AND STATE DEPARTMENTS OF CORRECTION TO A QUESTIONNAIRE ABOUT THE USEFULNESS OF RESEARCH, THE AREAS OF UTILITY, THE SOURCES OF THE RESEARCH, THE DESIGNS EMPLOYED, AND THE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE PERSONS PRODUCING THE RESEARCH, THE RESPONSES DISCLOSED THAT CRIMINAL JUSTICE AGENCIES VIEWED RESEARCH AS BEING MODERATELY OR CONSIDERABLY USEFUL IN IMPROVING THEIR OPERATIONS. IN-HOUSE RESEARCH WAS GENERALLY THE MOST HIGHLY VALUED SOURCE....MSP
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Changing Course: Preventing Gang Membership, Chapter 11. Program Evaluation: How Do We Know If We Are Preventing Gang Membership? (From Changing Course: Preventing Gang Membership, P 151-161, 2013, Thomas R. Simon, Nancy M. Ritter, and Reshma R. Mahendra,
- A pragmatic randomized controlled trial of virtual reality job interview training in prison employment services
- Phase Two of ETA: Evaluation of Technology-based Advocacy Services, Brief Summary