Based on research conducted in two law enforcement agencies (Detroit, MI, and Arlington, TX), the findings showed no significant differences between the three shift lengths regarding work performance, health, safety, and family conflict; however, officers working 10-hour shifts averaged significantly longer sleep periods and reported experiencing a better quality of work life than did the officers working 8-hour shifts. Officers working 12-hour shifts experienced greater levels of sleepiness (subjective measure of fatigue) and lower levels of alertness at work than those assigned to 8-hour shifts. Officers who worked 10-hour shifts spent less time in off-duty employment and in working overtime. This can result in cost savings and potentially more family and leisure time for officers working on a 10-hour shift. A 10-hour shift may be a viable alternative to the traditional 8-hour shift in larger agencies; however, caution is advised in adopting 12-hour shifts. Reduced levels of overtime use for officers working 10-hour and 12-hour shifts suggest agencies will save costs by adopting CWWs. The study used a randomized block experiment at the two sites in order to examine the effects of the three shift lengths on various outcomes. Work performance was measured using both laboratory simulations and departmental data. Health, quality of life, sleep, sleepiness, off-duty employment, and overtime hours were measured by self-reports, including surveys, sleep diaries, and alertness logs. 130 references, 25 tables, 1 figure, and appended study materials
Downloads
Similar Publications
- The Cross-Reactivity of the Cannabinoid Analogs (delta-8-THC, delta-10-THC and CBD) and their metabolites in Urine of Six Commercially Available Homogeneous Immunoassays, Grant Report
- Restorative Justice and School-wide Transformation: Identifying Drivers of Implementation and System Change
- Some Observations: Pretrial Hearings Before and After the PFA