U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

Group Mentoring Model

NCJ Number
305857
Date Published
January 2021
Length
47 pages
Annotation

This revised literature review is the first of the National Mentoring Resource Center Model Reviews to undergo an update, almost five years later; the authors address four topics related to group mentoring for children and adolescents and discusses evidence and research that address conditional factors, intervening processes, and factors related to implementation.

Abstract

This revised literature review addresses four topics related to group mentoring for children and adolescents: its documented effectiveness; the extent to which effectiveness depends on characteristics of mentors, mentees, or program practices; intervening processes likely to link group mentoring to youth outcomes; and the success of efforts to reach and engage targeted youth, achieve high-quality implementation, and adopt and sustain programs over time. The authors note a substantial increase in the number of research studies examining group mentoring and adds to a growing body of evidence supporting at least the short-term effectiveness of formal group mentoring programs. They also identify research that addresses conditional factors, intervening processes, and factors related to implementation. The authors suggests that evidence to date supports three conclusions: group mentoring programs can produce an array of positive outcomes for youth and seem to be effective across a wide range of youth characteristics and diverse program models; additional social and relational processes, such as group cohesion, belonging, and group identity, may also contribute to the outcomes that youth experience from group mentoring; group mentoring programs offer a context for activities that develop mentee skills, change mentee attitudes, and offer positive peer interactions, and these processes may lead to behavioral outcomes for participants. The authors also include insights and recommendations for practice, informed by the findings of the review.

Date Published: January 1, 2021