After documenting the extent of missing homicide data, this paper presents two methods of homicide rate adjustment that compensate for this problem. A comparison of adjusted and unadjusted homicide rates across cities, metropolitan areas, States, and regions indicates that while the two are highly related for family, acquaintance, and stranger homicide, unadjusted figures result in underestimation. A second source of inaccuracy, resulting from police departments' failure to submit monthly homicide reports, also is discussed; a weighting procedure is presented to adjust for nonreporting agencies. Adjusting for these missing data will increase the accuracy and reliability of rate calculations and the estimation of theoretical models. 7 tables and 19 references. (Author abstract modified)
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Long-Term Memory in Adults Exposed to Childhood Violence: Remembering Genital Contact Nearly 20 Years Later
- Evaluating a Multi-Disciplinary Response to Domestic Violence: The DVERT Program in Colorado Springs
- Two-Stage Approach for the Inference of the Source of High-Dimension and Complex Chemical Data in Forensic Science