Each victim was assigned to one of three treatment conditions: interview and written victim impact statement, interview only, and no interview or statement. During the intake procedure, victims rated the effects of their victimization in terms of physical harm, short-term financial impact, long-term financial impact, psychological harm, and behavioral changes. Victims were recontacted after one month to update information in their statements. Contrary to previous findings, the results reported here did not find that victim impact statements resulted in defendants receiving harsher sentences, nor did they produce sentencing decisions that reflected the effects of the crime on victims. There was little evidence that judges were influenced in their sentencing decisions by measures of the effects of crime on victims, once the charge and defendant's criminal history were taken into account. 3 tables, 4 notes, and 22 references
Downloads
Similar Publications
- From Childhood Maltreatment to Intimate Partner Violence Perpetration: a Prospective Longitudinal Examination of the Roles of Executive Functioning and Self-esteem
- Final Report of the Cross-Site Evaluation of the Juvenile Drug Treatment Court (JDTC) Guidelines: Executive Summary
- Macro-Level Influences on Police Decision-Making and Engagement with Victims of Serious Violent Crime: A Narrative Case Study of Two States