Research on the predictive utility of urine tests in New York City and elsewhere suggests that urine screening and monitoring data do not improve the ability to classify high-risk offenders or reduce pretrial misconduct under supervised release programs. Universal prearraignment drug screening of arrestees to identify high-risk defendants is not likely to be cost-effective. Further, there is a need to be aware of the multidimensional nature of drug abuse and and to evaluate the efficacy of drug treatment as a condition of pretrial release. Coupled with technical and process concerns surrounding drug tests, evidence suggests caution in the adoption of pretrial drug testing programs. Policy and program issues associated with pretrial drug testing are explored that pertain to pretrial release and supervision, resources, drug testing technology, and constitutional and due process issues. 41 references, 6 notes, and 5 tables
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Evaluation of the Cook County Community Based Transitional Services for Female Offenders Program
- Policing, Order Maintenance and Legitimacy (From Policing in Central and Eastern Europe: Dilemmas of Contemporary Criminal Justice, P 38-48, 2004, Gorazd Mesko, et al., eds. -- See NCJ-207973)
- Associations between News Media Coverage of the 11 September Attacks and Depression in Employees of New York City Area Businesses