The processing stages analyzed included screening, preliminary hearing, arraignment, guilty plea versus trial, and sentencing. Theoretical models of judicial decisionmaking were presented within the framework of the organizational perspective. The findings indicate that judges and prosecutors attempted to sort out cases with a low probability of conviction or involving less defendant criminality in the stages preceding conviction. After conviction, judges showed a greater willingness to impose severe sentences; the severity was influenced by the defendant's offense seriousness, uncooperativeness with the court, resistance to rehabilitation, or potential public threat. Interestingly, the findings indicate that minorities are more likely to be screened out in the earlier judicial stages, but more likely to receive severe sentences if they are eventually convicted. Female offenders are more likely than males to be dismissed in the preliminary and arraignment stages and to receive shorter sentences if convicted. 1 table, 5 notes, and 53 references (Author abstract modified)
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Crime, Place, and Networks in the Age of the Internet: The Case of Online-Promoted Illicit Massage Businesses
- How the Work Being Done on Statistical Fingerprint Models Provides the Basis for a Much Broader and Greater Impact Affecting Many Areas within the Criminal Justice System
- Why Getting Inside the "Black Box" Is Important: Examining Treatment Implementation and Outputs in Policing Experiments