Through interviews, this study examines the nature of corrupt environments and the aspects of a jurisdiction that influence corrupt behavior.
This study examines the public corruption conviction rate for all 94 US Attorneys’ offices in the US through interviews with community stakeholders, former public officials, former prosecutors, and investigators, the nature of corrupt environments is examined to find aspects of a jurisdiction that encourage or inhibit corrupt behaviors. According to interviews, local history and culture, leadership and contagion, and watchdog/oversight activity impact the culture of corruption. Leadership is a double-edged sword. Leadership can both encourage corruption and curb it. Prosecutions may serve a purpose to hold corrupt officials accountable; it does not stem the tide of corrupt cultures. Public corruption appears ubiquitous and increasing in the last few decades, according to public opinion polls. Trials and convictions of public officials usually receive extensive media attention. It is expected that high profile convictions would reduce corruption in an area as it puts individuals on notice about such behavior. Selected US Attorneys’ offices appear to account for the majority of public corruption convictions. (Published Abstract Provided)
- Identifying COVID-19 Policies and Practice that Juvenile Justice Systems Should Maintain Long-Term: Listening Session 3: State Juvenile Justice Agency Administrators
- The Implications of Stress Among Correctional Officers: A Summary of the Risks and Promising Intervention Strategies
- Trauma Appraisals and Posttraumatic Growth Among Survivors of Sexual Assault