Licensing and hiring decisionmakers are often encouraged or required to incorporate evidence of rehabilitation into hiring decisions when applicants have criminal records. Current policy movements at the local, state, and federal levels may increase the use of such individualized assessments. The current study found that administrative law judges rely on a narrative framework to document whether applicants currently have a prosocial identity and merit licensure. Judges typically describe one of two prosocial identity narratives for successful applicants that include the applicant demonstrating meaningful change, or his or her criminal record represents an aberration. Two factors seem vital to these assessments, i.e., applicants' postconviction trustworthiness, as demonstrated through good conduct or inferred through positive appraisals, and credible testimony. In narrative explanations, personal responsibility and adult milestones are often discussed, reflecting a judicial nod to the notion of a "transition to adulthood." These results have implications for scholars and policymakers in examining employment barriers, stigma remediation, and collateral sanctions for individuals with criminal records. (publisher abstract modified)
Downloads
Similar Publications
- Lead by Example: The Effects of Police Supervisors on Officer Behavior
- You're Stressing Me Out: Adolescent Stress Response to Social Evaluation and its Effect on Risky Decision-Making
- Study of Government-Subsidized Housing Rehabilitation Programs and Arson - Analysis of Programs Administered in New York City, 1978-1981 - Executive Summary