Comparison of the Columnar-Thin-Film and Vacuum-Metal-Deposition Techniques To Develop Sebaceous Fingermarks on Nonporous Substrates

• NCJ Number: 249390
• Journal: Journal of Forensic Sciences Volume: 60 Issue: 2 Dated: March 2015 Pages: 295-302
• Author(s): Stephanie F. Williams; Drew P. Pulsifer; Robert C. Shaler; Robert C.. Shaler; Robert S. Ramotowski; Shelly Brazelle; Akhlesh Lakhtakia
• Date Published: March 2015
• Length: 8 pages
• Grant Number(s): 2010-DN-BX-K232
• Agencies: NIJ-Sponsored
• Publication Type: Research (Applied/Empirical); Report (Study/Research); Report (Grant Sponsored)
• Award: Acquisition of Fingerprint Topology using Columnar Thin Films

Annotation

This study used a split-print methodology on a variety of fingermarked substrates to determine whether the columnar-thin-film (CTF) technique is superior to the vacuum-metal-deposition (VMU) for developing fingermarks on clear sandwich bags and partial bloody fingermarks on stainless steel.

Abstract

Both the CTF and the VMD techniques for visualizing sebaceous fingermarks require the deposition of a material thereon in a vacuum chamber. Despite that similarity, there are many differences between the two techniques. The film deposited with the CTF technique has a columnar morphology, but the film deposited with the VMD technique comprises discrete islands. The current study found that both techniques are similar in their ability to develop fingermarks on glass, but the CTF technique yields higher contrast. The VMD technique was superior for developing fingermarks on white grocery bags and the smooth side of Gloss Finish Scotch Multitask tape. Neither technique worked well for fingermarks on black garbage bags. (Publisher abstract modified)