Comparative Assessment of the Chen et al. and Suchey-Brooks Pubic Aging Methods on a North American Sample

• NCJ Number: 246041
• Author(s): Julie M. Fleischman M.S.
• Date Published: March 2013
• Length: 13 pages
• Agencies: NIJ-Sponsored
• Award: NIJ/FSF Forensic Science Student Research Program

Annotation

This study evaluates the accuracy of two pubic bone age estimation methods—Chen et al. and Suchey-Brooks.

Abstract

Accurately estimating the age-at-death of adult human skeletons is fundamental in forensic anthropology. This study evaluates the accuracy of two pubic bone age estimation methods—Chen et al. and Suchey-Brooks. Specimens were obtained from a known collection of modern pubic bones curated at the Maricopa County Forensic Science Center in Phoenix, Arizona. A sample of 296 left male pubic bones of European ancestry was statistically evaluated via bias, absolute mean error, and intra- and inter-observer error. Results indicate that the two methods are similar; the Suchey-Brooks method is the most accurate for aging young adults error c. 7 years, while the Revised Chen et al. method is most accurate for aging middle-age adults error c. 6 years. Thus, the Chen et al. method is an important contribution to forensic anthropology for aging older adult skeletal remains. There are, however, some limitations such as subjectivity and the intricate scoring system of Chen et al. method. Abstract published by arrangement with John Wiley & Sons.