U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

Challenges to Reasoning in Forensic Science Decisions

NCJ Number
304558
Journal
Forensic Science International: Synergy Volume: Online Dated: December 2021
Author(s)
Barbara A. Spellman; Heidi Eldridge; Paul Bieber
Date Published
December 2021
Annotation

This article addresses how characteristics of human reasoning (either specific to an individual or in general) and characteristics of situations (either specific to a case or in general in a lab) can contribute to errors before, during, or after forensic analyses.

 

Abstract

The success of forensic science depends heavily on human reasoning abilities. Although we typically navigate our lives well using those abilities, decades of psychological science research shows that human reasoning is not always rational. In addition, forensic science often demands that its practitioners reason in non-natural ways. In feature comparison judgments, such as fingerprints or firearms, a main challenge is to avoid biases from extraneous knowledge or arising from the comparison method itself. In causal and process judgments, for example fire scenes or pathology, a main challenge is to keep multiple potential hypotheses open as the investigation continues. Considering the contributions to forensic science judgments by persons, situations, and their interaction, reveals ways to develop procedures to decrease errors and improve accuracy. (Publisher Abstract)

 

Date Published: December 1, 2021