Archival Notice
This is an archive page that is no longer being updated. It may contain outdated information and links may no longer function as originally intended.
This article examines why incarceration of offenders has not paid off as an effective means of reducing crime rates. The author examines the current level of incarceration rates and crime rates to determine whether mass incarceration has been effective at lowering the crime rates. Research indicates that while mass incarceration has helped reduce crime rates, the effects have been considerably smaller than anticipated, and that the current level of benefits from mass incarceration are too low compared to its costs. In addition, with more offenders leaving prison with long criminal records and histories of substance abuse, unemployment, and homelessness, an increased effort needs to be put forth to help them successfully reenter society. Recent rehabilitation programs that incorporate proven principles and aimed at specific categories of offenders have been successful at reducing recidivism rates. These programs include intensive drug treatment programs, education, and vocational skills training programs for offenders while in prison. Other efforts include improvements in probation and parole programs that focus on individual cases as opposed to a one-size-fits-all approach, and community partnerships to provide resources and assistance to recently released offenders.
Similar Publications
- SCA Follow-Up Study: A Longitudinal Study of 2009 Second Chance Act Adult Demonstration Program Participant
- The Effects of a Co-Response Program on Patrol Call Volume for Mental Health Crisis-Related Calls: A Time Series Analysis
- Guide for the Selection of Personal Protective Equipment for Emergency First Responders (Percutaneous Protection-Garments); NIJ Guide 102-00, Volume IIb