This article compares the advantages and disadvantages of the CPI and LR methods to the RMP method.
Mixed DNA profiles are being encountered more frequently as laboratories analyze increasing amounts of touch evidence. If it is determined that an individual could be a possible contributor to the mixture, it is necessary to perform a statistical analysis to allow an assignment of weight to the evidence. Currently, the combined probability of inclusion (CPI) and the likelihood ratio (LR) are the most commonly used methods to perform the statistical analysis. A third method, random match probability (RMP), is available. This article compares the advantages and disadvantages of the CPI and LR methods to the RMP method. The reseachers demonstrate that although the LR method is still considered the most powerful of the binary methods, the RMP and LR methods make similar use of the observed data such as peak height, assumed number of contributors, and known contributors where the CPI calculation tends to waste information and be less informative. Abstract published by arrangement with John Wiley & Sons.
Similar Publications
- Development of a Novel Five-dye Panel for Human Identification Insertion/deletion (INDEL) Polymorphisms
- Microbiome Data Accurately Predicts the Postmortem Interval Using Machine Learning Regression Models
- Validation of a LC-DAD-ESI/MS/MS Method for the Accurate Measurement of Δ9-THC and Δ9-THCA-A Among Twenty Cannabinoids in Various Products of Cannabis