This awardee has received supplemental funding. This award detail page includes information about both the original award and supplemental awards.
Description of original award (Fiscal Year 2015, $936,571)
Goals and Objectives: This award responds to the need to identify and evaluate promising practices used in
community-level programs designed to prevent radicalization to violence. This study conducts an evaluation of
Safe Spaces, a community-led violence prevention program developed by the Muslim Public Affairs Council
(MPAC). Safe Spaces aims to empower Muslim communities to protect themselves against misguided ideas
and violent actions through community investment in social and religious programs and community adoption of
multi-disciplinary "crisis inquiry teams" that intervene when an individual is at risk of engaging in violent
behavior. The knowledge generated through this study will inform the development, implementation and
effectiveness of community-led CVE programs.
Subjects: The subjects for this study include persons from community sites in 9 U.S. cities and their partners in
law enforcement and other agencies (n=540).
Research Designs and Methods: This is a three-year, multi-site, mixed methods study. The study consists of
three aims: Aim 1: Program Modification. To further refine and adapt Safe Spaces, the researchers will conduct
3 focus groups with participants from mosques, schools, and service organizations, and convene a program
design lab to inform MPAC's further refining and adapting Safe Spaces. Aim 2: Examining Implementation. To
assess implementation processes, facilitators and barriers to implementation, collaborators, and the
sustainability planning of Safe Spaces using a mixed methods approach that includes process measures, a
survey, focus groups, and observations of the local leadership and the crisis inquiry team in 9 community sites.
Aim 3: Examining Impact. To examine the impact of Safe Spaces' implementation conducted by local
communities, through documenting Prevention and Intervention activities and their intermediate outcomes in
the 9 community sites. Aim 4: Improving Evaluation Methods. To convene a joint community, policymaker, and
academic workshop, so as to collaboratively develop practical and usable educational materials and evaluation
tools that will facilitate community-led prevention.
Analysis: The overall mixed methods analysis incorporates multiple data types (process measures, surveys,
focus groups and observations), both quantitative and qualitative analysis, and a participatory research
Products, Reports, and Data Archiving: The project will generate educational materials and evaluation tools and
procedures that will help community-based organizations, law enforcement, and other government agencies to
initiate and/or strengthen community-level CVE programs. It will also produce reports, presentations, and
articles on community-level CVE programs and their evaluation. By also involving MPAC and START, findings
from this study will be transitioned to local, state, and federal practitioners.
This project contains a research and/or development component, as defined in applicable law.
The requested funds will be used to continue support of the Safe Spaces intervention through funding of a Safe Spaces Coordinator at the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC). This person will be responsible for recruitment of community sites and training and technical assistance at sites. nca/ncf
- Examining the Black Box: A Formative and Evaluability Assessment of Cross-sectoral Approaches for Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence
- Access to Justice for Adolescents and Young Adults Experiencing Intimate Partner Violence: Effectiveness and Accessibility of Civil Protection Orders
- Preventing the next sext: A behavioral economic approach to understanding nude photo sharing decisions in a high school community